We live in a hybrid times. We have fusion music, fusion dance, fusion food. Even the philosophy goes fusion now. We had two movements "Save paper" and "Save tiger". We combined the two and are busy in "Saving paper tigers".
Thoughts about how we humans think, behave, even if that may not be in our best interests, but what makes us normal human beings.
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Thoughts on communication
A lot has been said about the importance of communication in our life –
be it personal or family life, social life or work life. I have worked in fields
– sales & marketing and training – where communication is extremely important.
Here is an attempt to pen down some of my thoughts on communication.
Whenever we communicate with someone, there are two parts of the
message: the content and the emotion – which is nothing but the vehicle to
carry the contents of the message.
Most often, we give so much importance to the vehicle that the content
becomes secondary. The listener has to learn how to separate the content from
the emotions to get the true meaning. Emotion is not so important, focus on the
contents. Having separated content from the emotion, pass the content through
your own filters – to ensure what comes in is right and appropriate. Be just
and open while filtering.
I have come across many situations when the boss has distanced himself
away from the colleagues only because one has not taken due care while
communicating.
I met one of my friends some time back. He was
very upset when we met. While we started to chat, he continued to drift away
from the conversation. I asked him what was going on. Incidentally, he was just
out of a feedback session with his boss. In the session, his boss had used very
offensive language while giving the feedback. When he repeated the actual words
spoken, I was quite shocked since I knew the boss also well. Knowing the boss,
I had an idea that the feedback may not be completely wrong, but still the
language used was so offensive that my friend was not ready to get the true
feedback and kept on worrying about the actual words used.
I told my friend not to worry a lot about what was
actually said and asked him to concentrate on the incident, which caused the
boss to give this kind of feedback. We went over the incident – there were two incidents,
in fact – and realized that in one case, while my friend had been a bit careless,
the second was a case of misunderstanding between the two. Having probed deeper
into the two incidents, the things were now very clear to my friend. The next
day, he went to his boss – apologized for his carelessness in the first
instance and clarified the misunderstanding in the second.
This made a lot of sense to the boss and he
appreciated the fact that my friend took the initiative and looked at the
feedback session in quite an objective manner. He also apologized for his use
of wrong words.
This was a simple case of separating the content from emotions. The
moment one does that, the mind becomes a lot clearer. Issues come out on the
surface and one can then address those. This not only helps solve the issues,
it also builds better relationships.
The other side of the above story is when you want to convey a message.
The vehicle better be strong and powerful enough to imprint the message. In
order to convey a message properly various emotions – humor, anger, concern,
fear, etc. – may need to be mixed with one’s words. At the same time, the
content and the feelings need to be aligned properly – if one wishes to thank
someone and send the words “thank you” through the vehicle of boredom – how
will the listener take it? There is no genuineness.
This sounds like a contradiction – you need to separate the content
from the emotions while listening but you need to mix the two while sending out
a message. And it is not like what happens in electronic communication when the
transmitter mixes two frequencies for better transmission and the receiver unit
separates the two signals on receipt. That happens for better transmission of
the signals. In case of the communication we are referring to – the
inter-personal communication – we need to behave as I have suggested since we
are dealing with humans and generally a normal human being is an emotional
person.
Now, someone might feel that I am suggesting you to be artificial and
use the feelings just to get your work done even if you may not be feeling that
way. Let me assure you that if one is faking the emotions, one may not be
successful over longer periods. Abraham Lincoln has very rightly said: "You can fool all the people some of
the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the
people all the time." The feelings you have and the feelings you use
to convey a message have to be in line and that will happen only if you
strongly believe in what you are saying. Fakes have a very short shelf life.
Monday, June 4, 2012
Petrol price hike - normal reaction
Petrol prices
hiked by Rs. 7.50. The headlines looked scary. People reacted to the news in
various ways. One of the ways was to fill up the tank before the prices
actually went up. On the face of it, that looks like a sensible thing to do.
However, once you do a quick calculation, you would realize the cost of filling
up one final time before the hike.
In many
places, people queued up in front of petrol pumps in the evening after
returning from their respective offices. Long, serpentine queues were quite common.
In certain places, people had to wait to a couple of hours before their turn at
the pump.
Now, let us do
quick Math. Assuming someone went with a mid-sized car with the tank (capacity:
40 liters) empty. At Rs. 7.50 per liter, by filling up the tank, our friend
saved Rs. 300.
If one had to
wait in the queue for an hour and a half, the cost of time would be Rs. 200 per
hour, as someone saved Rs. 300 by spending 1.5 hours. If one had to specially
go from home to the petrol pump, you have to add the fuel burnt for the travel.
Add to that
the mental agony of waiting for what feels like eternity. In the heat of May,
some kept the car AC running, burning some precious petrol. It only required
burning 4 liters of petrol to spend what was saved through the effort of
queuing up.
We often
behave in such amazing ways that appear to be very rational, until someone
thinks dispassionately. What looked rational was actually the response to a
pain caused by the petrol price hike.
The human
brain is wired to think rationally and irrationally, simultaneously. Very often,
our responses are completely rational; very often, totally irrational. Such inconsistency
makes us normal human beings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)